Considering Anomali for threat intelligence?
Anomali is a category-defining threat intelligence platform with deep feed aggregation and a broad integration ecosystem. If what you actually want is finished intelligence tailored to each organisation, delivered as a service that makes a small team go a long way, this is how Liberty91 compares.
Start Free TrialWhat Anomali is good at.
Anomali is one of the original threat intelligence platforms, and that pedigree shows. It is strong at aggregating and normalising large volumes of feeds, integrating with the rest of a mature security stack, and giving a dedicated team a powerful surface to operate. More recent additions bring AI-assisted analytics and a security data lake into the same environment.
If you have an established SOC and CTI team who want a platform to run, with the breadth of integrations a large enterprise environment needs, Anomali is a serious option and deserves a place on the shortlist.
At a glance.
A fair, side-by-side read of where each one puts its emphasis.
| Anomali | Liberty91 | |
|---|---|---|
| Primary focus | A threat intelligence platform for aggregating, normalising, and operationalising feeds, with broad integrations and a security data lake. | An end-to-end platform that runs collection to delivery for you and produces finished, tailored intelligence per organisation. |
| Best fit for | Enterprise SOC and dedicated CTI teams that want a powerful platform to operate, with newer tiers reaching toward mid-market. | MSSPs delivering a service per customer, and mid-market teams that want the output of a CTI function without building one. |
| Operating model | Your team configures the platform, manages feeds and integrations, and runs the analysis and reporting on top of it. | The platform runs the lifecycle. Your people review and direct the work rather than carrying collection and formatting. |
| Per-customer tailoring | Rich data and analytics that your analysts shape to your environment. | Self-maintaining Intelligence Requirements per organisation, so every event is assessed for relevance to that specific organisation. |
| MSSP and white-label | A dedicated MSSP programme with multi-tenant support. | Multi-tenant by design, with white-label across the sender, email templates, and report PDFs, priced per customer. |
| Pricing model | Quote-based, enterprise sales. Pricing is not publicly listed. | Per customer organisation, so cost scales with your customer base. Built to stay accessible to mid-market budgets. |
Where Liberty91 is different.
Finished intelligence, not just aggregation
Aggregating and normalising feeds is a strong foundation, and it is where a lot of platform value sits. Liberty91 starts after that point: it assesses relevance against each organisation's requirements and hands over finished reports, IOC lists, Sigma rules, and STIX bundles, drafted and ready to use.
Tailored to each organisation by default
Each organisation gets its own self-maintaining Intelligence Requirements and a dedicated agent stack. Two organisations in the same sector get different reads because their requirements differ. The relevance call is made for them, not for a generic enterprise audience.
A multiplier for the team you have
You get the output of a mature CTI function without standing up a large analyst practice or licensing sources one by one. If you already have analysts, Liberty91 makes them reach much further: the collection and first-draft production run at machine speed, so the same team covers far more, faster, and spends its time on judgement rather than plumbing. Real intel at machine speed, and a force multiplier, not a replacement.
White-label delivery for MSSPs
Run it across a whole customer base under your own brand. White-label the sender and reply-to, the email templates, and the report PDFs, and prove delivery per customer through Mailroom's auditable Sent log.
When Liberty91 is likely the better fit.
Liberty91 tends to be the stronger choice when you want finished intelligence rather than a platform to operate. That is usually true if you are an MSSP delivering a tailored service to many customers under your own brand, or a mid-market team that wants real intelligence mapped to your assets and suppliers without standing up a dedicated function first.
If your priority is a platform your in-house team operates with a very wide integration estate, an established enterprise TIP may suit you better. Both are valid; it comes down to whether you want to run the lifecycle or have it run for you.
Frequently Asked Questions.
Ready to do more with less?
Request a demo or start your free trial today. Get instant access to AI-powered threat intelligence tailored to your organisation.