Comparing SOCRadar for threat intelligence?
SOCRadar is a strong, consolidated external threat intelligence platform with a well-regarded MSSP programme. If what you want is deeply tailored, finished intelligence delivered per customer and white-labelled end to end, here is how Liberty91 compares.
Start Free TrialWhat SOCRadar is good at.
SOCRadar consolidates a lot into one platform: cyber threat intelligence, external attack surface management, and digital risk protection, with strong dark-web and credential-leak monitoring and brand-abuse detection. Its MSSP programme is genuinely capable, with a multi-tenant console and co-brandable reporting, and it has a reputation for being accessible on price.
If you want broad external visibility across surface, deep, and dark web in a single consolidated tool, SOCRadar is a strong choice and belongs on the shortlist.
At a glance.
A fair, side-by-side read of where each one puts its emphasis.
| SOCRadar | Liberty91 | |
|---|---|---|
| Primary focus | Extended threat intelligence that combines CTI, external attack surface management, and digital risk protection in one platform. | End-to-end threat intelligence tailored to each organisation, with collection to delivery run for you and finished reporting produced. |
| Best fit for | SOCs and MSSPs that want consolidated external visibility across the surface, deep, and dark web in a single tool. | MSSPs and mid-market teams that want finished, per-customer intelligence delivered under their own brand. |
| Tailoring model | Modules and alerts configured to your assets, brand, and digital footprint. | Self-maintaining Intelligence Requirements per organisation, so every event is assessed for relevance to that specific organisation. |
| Output style | Alerts and dashboards across attack surface and digital risk, with reporting on top. | Finished daily and thematic reports surfaced, prioritised, and drafted in real time, plus IOC, Sigma, and STIX into tooling. |
| MSSP and white-label | A strong MSSP programme with a multi-tenant console and co-brandable reports. | Multi-tenant with white-label across the sender, the email templates, and the report PDFs, priced per customer. |
| Pricing model | Modular subscription, scope-based; specifics through sales. | Per customer organisation, designed to stay accessible to mid-market budgets. |
Where Liberty91 is different.
Requirements-led tailoring
Each organisation gets its own self-maintaining Intelligence Requirements derived from its assets, suppliers, sector, and geography. Rather than configuring modules and alert rules, you describe what matters and the platform reads every event through every relevant requirement. Two organisations in the same sector get different reports because their requirements differ.
Finished reporting, drafted in real time
Alongside alerts and dashboards, Liberty91 produces finished reports tailored to each customer, surfaced, prioritised, and drafted in real time, plus thematic reports on a specific actor, malware family, or campaign in minutes. Your analysts review and direct rather than write from scratch.
White-label down to the sender and the PDF
Co-branding puts a logo on a report. Liberty91 white-labels the sender name and reply-to address, the email templates, and the report PDFs end to end, so the whole experience, from the inbox to the document, reads as yours.
Real intel at machine speed, a multiplier for your team
The lifecycle runs at machine speed, so you get the output of a mature CTI function without standing up a large analyst practice. For teams that already have analysts, it is a force multiplier rather than a replacement: the same people cover far more, faster, and you can prove delivery per customer through Mailroom's auditable Sent log.
When Liberty91 is likely the better fit.
Liberty91 tends to be the stronger choice when the priority is finished, deeply tailored intelligence delivered per customer rather than a consolidated set of external-risk dashboards to monitor. For MSSPs that want a service fully under their own brand, with each customer running on its own Intelligence Requirements, the white-label depth and per-customer tailoring are the deciding factors.
If broad external attack surface and digital risk coverage in one tool is the main need, a consolidated platform like SOCRadar may suit you better. The two emphasise different things, and the right pick depends on which problem is in front of you.
Frequently Asked Questions.
Ready to do more with less?
Request a demo or start your free trial today. Get instant access to AI-powered threat intelligence tailored to your organisation.